🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that smartphones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a solid foundation," said one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the regional level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a law limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, other countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.